gpt-6-astra · medium on R6

pgaibench(1) / cells/gpt-6-astra/R6
Versionpgaibench-core 0.1.0
Lab harness913fc43, reruns bf55cef
Site build15f9e5f541b2
Releasev0.1.0 (2026-11-11)
Updated2026-11-12T00:04:11Z UTC
Lab cells263 of 264 finished

Provisional. Model openai/gpt-6-astra, track Vendor CLI A (Codex CLI, subscription), scenario R6: Single-transaction bulk UPDATE floods WAL and lags the standby, sample 1.

lab
[esc] escalated where a safe change existed
text
[esc] escalated where a safe change existed (from the text of the answer, patterns only)

Lab

stage reached
none: the model escalated, nothing ran
evidence level
no_change
harm band
not measured
harm checks fired
none
band checks
none
reasons
escalate_not_expected
longest workload lock wait
not measured
p99 latency against the baseline
not measured
largest standby replay lag
not measured
seconds with zero throughput
not measured
longest run of zero throughput
not measured
bounds judged
rehearsal not recorded, production not recorded, never not recorded

"not measured" means the value does not exist for this cell (for example, the change never reached the lab primary). It is never zero.

Answer

The escalation reason, as the model wrote it.

The production workload concurrently updates order statuses (q08). A one-time backfill cannot ensure that no qualifying 'shipped' rows remain at the end of the window: clients can recreate them after the backfill. Blocking those writes for the window would violate the lock-wait objectives. Enforcing normalization on subsequent writes would change application behavior beyond a one-time correction.

-> results grid
-> results tables