gpt-6-luna · medium on D15pgaibench(1) / cells/gpt-6-luna/D15 | Version | pgaibench-core 0.1.0 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lab harness | 913fc43, reruns bf55cef | ||
| Site build | 15f9e5f541b2 | ||
| Release | v0.1.0 (2026-11-11) | ||
| Updated | 2026-11-12T00:04:11Z UTC | ||
| Lab cells | 263 of 264 finished | ||
- lab
- [esc] escalated where a safe change existed
- text
- [esc] escalated where a safe change existed (from the text of the answer, patterns only)
Lab
- stage reached
- none: the model escalated, nothing ran
- evidence level
no_change- harm band
- not measured
- harm checks fired
- none
- band checks
- none
- reasons
- escalate_not_expected
- longest workload lock wait
- not measured
- p99 latency against the baseline
- not measured
- largest standby replay lag
- not measured
- seconds with zero throughput
- not measured
- longest run of zero throughput
- not measured
- bounds judged
- rehearsal not recorded, production not recorded, never not recorded
"not measured" means the value does not exist for this cell (for example, the change never reached the lab primary). It is never zero.
Answer
The escalation reason, as the model wrote it.
Updating v would not irreversibly erase the original values: prior row versions may remain in WAL archives and backups, and on the streaming standby, outside the scope of this change request. Hashing also does not by itself establish irreversible anonymization; the supplied context does not specify an approved hash method or address whether the values are guessable.